I thought that it was understood …

The political documents cannot enter, for material impossibility, to gather all the positions on the totality of the matters about which a political organization as Izquierda Unida there will be of posicionarse: what is done is to plan a general program with a few plan of action, which will have to be moved to the concrete case applying the reason and the common sense.
It is not a necessary explicitar in the documents, for example, that Izquierda Unida is opposed energetically to the ablation of the clitoris to the women. This aspect is something so obvious and deductible of the rational, sensitive and feminist orientation of IU that is presupposed. Being like that, if any militant or leader of Izquierda Unida will demonstrate favorably to the feminine genital mutilation it would be violating the political documents, although not explicitara in them the opposition of the organization to this one class of aberrant practices.
Taking it previously said like premise, I always thought that if in Izquierda Unida there was no explicit position in the political documents about the tauromachy it was because the opposition was understood to this one. The opposition to the animal torture is something so obvious and deductible of the rational, sensitive and environmental orientation of IU that is presupposed. It seems that it is not like that, and that the IU position on the topic will have to be debated in the organs (I do not know if it will limit itself to the organs of the federation of Madrid or will rise up to the federal organs, preventing from turning to give this one type of situation in any other place).
It looks like to me a wasting time to have to come to a few organs that with almost all probability will be pronounced unanimously about posicionar to Izquierda Unida against the form of animal maltreatment known as “bullfights“: traditionally this one organization has endorsing initiatives that do not leave place to doubts like the presented one not long ago any more than one year in the Congress of the Deputies that took as an object to chase “the authorized animal torture” (where in his explanatory preamble things as sensible were said as that “it is already time to stop disgracing and to appear if the tradition justifies everything”). Even considering it a wasting time, I suppose that every cloud has a silver lining: it will be a good moment to reaffirm our anti-bullfighting character of explicit form, trying to extend with our efforts to the rest of Spain the happy initiative that seems that it will prosper in Catalonia.
[Related earnings: "6 bullfighting lies 6" of Student and: "Organs? To me what organs?" of Who Great It Includes]